recursos - em falácias

20 09 2007


No contexto das falácias, a expressa distinção de diversos tipos:

Logical Fallacies

The ability to identify logical fallacies in the arguments of others, and to avoid them in one’s own arguments, is both valuable and increasingly rare. Fallacious reasoning keeps us from knowing the truth, and the inability to think critically makes us vulnerable to manipulation by those skilled in the art of rhetoric.

A logical fallacy is, roughly speaking, an error of reasoning. When someone adopts a position, or tries to persuade someone else to adopt a position, based on a bad piece of reasoning, they comit a fallacy. I say “roughly speaking” because this definition has a few problems, the most important of which are outlined below. Some logical fallacies are more common than others, and so have been named and defined.

Fallacies of presumption

Fallacies of presumption are not errors of reasoning in the sense of logical errors, but are nevertheless commonly classed as fallacies. Fallacies of presumption begin with a false (or at least unwarranted) assumption, and so fail to establish their conclusion.

Fallacies of ambiguity

Fallacies of ambiguity appear to support their conclusions only due to their imprecise use of language. Once terms are clarified, fallacies of ambiguity are exposed. It is to avoid fallacies of this type that philosophers often carefully define their terms before launching into an argument.

Fallacies of relevance

Fallacies of relevance are attempts to prove a conclusion by offering considerations that simply don’t bear on its truth. In order to prove that a conclusion is true, one must offer evidence that supports it. Arguments that commit fallacies of relevance don’t do this; the considerations that they offer in support of their conclusion are irrelevant to determining whether that conclusion is true. The considerations offered by such are usually psychologically powerful, however, even if they don’t have any evidential value.

Alguns recursos:

The NIZKOR Project,
Nizkor is a Hebrew word which means “We will remember.”
Fallacies, 42 no total

Logical Fallacies


Acções

Informação

2 respostas para “recursos - em falácias”

25 09 2007
Alexandre Sousa (20:36:00) :

Encontrei questões quase completas (para fazer jus a Gödel) sobre falácias na disciplina de Inteligência Artificial ou como quer Hofstadter, nas ciências cognitivas.
Mandei uma amostra para o endereço do gmail.

Continuaremos…

29 09 2007
LN (10:42:00) :

Ora, já li e agora aguardo o «ok» para colocar o texto.
Está a ficar beminteresante, esta «coisa» das falácias (e sim, coisa como diria Heidegger, em «O que é uma coisa?»)…
:)

Deixe um comentário

Pode utilizar estas tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>